| From | Comment | To |
|
|
Posted:
Feb 7 2010 3:45 AM
I, C-Mach, endorse kempite in Thursday's Republican runoff (Absolutely no question you, considering who your opponent is.).
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 29 2010 11:42 AM
This from "The Lid".....
One of the many targets the President attacked during his SOTU were lobbyists:
To close that credibility gap we must take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue to end the outsized influence of lobbyists; to do our work openly; and to give our people the government they deserve.
That’s what I came to Washington to do. That’s why – for the first time in history – my Administration posts our White House visitors online. And that’s why we’ve excluded lobbyists from policy-making jobs or seats on federal boards and commissions.
But we can’t stop there. It’s time to require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my Administration or Congress. And it’s time to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office. That statement about excluding lobbyists from policy making Jobs is an out right lie. The White House is full of them. Timothy Carney reported in his Wash. Examiner this morning that the President's statement:
is belied by the dozens of former lobbyists currently serving in his administration, including in policy-making jobs.
For instance, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack was a lobbyist for the National Education Association in March of 2008. He is exempted from Obama's ethics rules because his Cabinet job is not relevant to his recent lobbying work
In the field agriculture, two former lobbyists --Monsanto's Michael Taylor and CropLife America's Isi Siddiqui -- have been named to policy-making jobs. Their lobbying stints, however, were outside the two-year window covered by the executive order.
William J. Lynn, a lobbyist for leading defense contractor Raytheon received a waiver from Obama in order to serve as deputy secretary of defense.
Treasury Department Chief of Staff Mark Patterson, on the other hand, has not received a waiver although he was a Goldman Sachs lobbyist as late as April 2008, lobbying on issue areas such as monetary policy, tax policy, and financial policy.
At least 16 former registered lobbyists serve in the Obama administration. Despite the fact that the President has many of these lobbyists serving in his administration, last night he tagged them as political lepers. But that was last night, today is a brand spanking new day.
Today President Barack Obama’s administration invited K Street lobbyists to join private briefings on a range of topics addressed in Wednesday’s State of the Union.
The Treasury Department on Thursday morning invited selected individuals to “a series of conference calls with senior Obama administration officials to discuss key aspects of the State of the Union address.”
The invitation, which went to a variety of stakeholders, was sent by Fred Baldassaro, a senior adviser at the Treasury Department’s Office of Business Affairs and Public Liaison.
The invitation stated, “The White House is encouraging you to participate in these calls and will have a question and answer session at the end of each call. As a reminder, these calls are not intended for press purposes.”
The calls are scheduled to begin at 11:30 a.m. on Thursday, with the first topic being job creation and economic growth.
Another call, at 1 p.m., is on government reform and transparency. Republicans have criticized the Obama White House for not being more transparent in its discussions with Congress on healthcare reform. Obama recently acknowledged that the legislative process has not been as open as he promised on the campaign trail.
Other issues that will be addressed on Thursday include education, climate change and healthcare reform.
A handful of lobbyists told The Hill on Thursday morning that they received the invitations and were planning to call in.
Some lobbyists say they are extremely frustrated with the White House for criticizing them and then seeking their feedback. Others note that Democrats on Capitol Hill constantly urge them to make political donations.
One lobbyist said, “Bash lobbyists, then reach out to us. Bash lobbyists [while] I have received four Democratic invitations for fundraisers.” But that is the President's practice, he uses you one day and throws you under the BUS the next. Just ask Reverand Wright or his Grandma.
Lobbyists say the Obama White House has held many off-the-record teleconferences over the past year.
For example, lobbyists and others were invited to a teleconference with “senior Obama administration officials” on Monday to discuss the administration’s plan to improve the lives of middle-class families.
The invitation, which is addressed to “Friends,” emphasizes in bold and italics that “this call is for background information only and not intended for press purposes.” It advises callers to tell the operator “you’re joining the ‘White House Briefing Call.’ ” How could he brief them, during his SOTU speech he said they had cooties. But another lobbyist said these types of teleconferences occur “all the time" (well maybe it isn't a bad case of cooties).
And that is why many on K Street are exasperated with Obama’s use of lobbyists as a punching bag. Some have said they understood why he used strong rhetoric on the campaign trail but are irritated the White House solicits their opinions while Obama’s friends in Congress badger them for political donations.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 29 2010 10:48 AM
Good for you Erock. Now when you can think like an adult.....Get back to us.
Now, I will ignore you.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 29 2010 1:27 AM
Schmuck, I did not say I am ignoring you, I am "annoying" you. There's a big difference, douchebag. Keep paying attention to me and following me around like a lost puppy and i'll tell you when I am ignoring you, dick.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 29 2010 1:00 AM
"Yawn"...Hahahahahahaha....that was the most intellectually pertinent thing you've written on this site yet. Maybe Mommy can teach you what it means now.
In the meantime, seriously Erock, kiss my ass, you useless bootlicker.
Speak to the hand, Dude, because I am over you, you whiny freak. And stop asking me for favors. You call me a hack but want me to help you work for politicians and political campaigns. What are hypocritical dick you are. So long sucker.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 28 2010 11:30 PM
 As expected New York City’s Mayor Mike Bloomberg has changed his mnd about trying the enemy combatants who were behind the 9/11 attacks in a New York City civilian court.
Residents in the area of where the trial will be held have been demonstrating against the move. They have made it clear that the disruption caused by the enormous security measures and fear of retaliation in the area, will make life for local New Yorkers miserable. Merchants have also offered their protestations to the trial of foreign terrorist being held in their backyard. They claim that the massive security operation will create unbearable congestion and disruption that will disrupt and in some cases, shut down local commerce. Streets will be closed and stores, stores will be empty and small business owners will suffer yet again because of terrorism.
After detailed assessments of what the cost New York will be forced to cover because of the President’s decision to not try the 9/11 Five in a military court . Mayor Bloomberg out the price tag at a minimum of $1 billion dollars.
Between the heavy price tag and the chorus of cries from the New Yorkers who will be most affected by the President’s decision, the Mayor concluded that he hopes Attorney General Holder and President Obama “change their mind”. But Bloomberg is not concerned with the unseemliness of trying foreign, enemy combatants in a civilian court. His concern is the cost. And it is not an unreasonable for a City going through tough economic times. Bloomberg suggests that decision makers move the trial from the Daniel
Patrick Moynihan Federal Court house to a military base or possibly even West Point. He adds that such a location might be inconvenient for jurors to get to, but the traffic in New York City will be so tied up in knots because of the trial that getting the downtown Daniel Patrick Moynihan Federal Court will also be inconvenient.
Although Bloomberg’s wish that the powers that be conduct the civilian trial on a military installation is only based on financial concerns, others are concerned with the elevated threat that the trial will attract. Many also wonder how enemy combatants who have not been read their Miranda rights can actually be tried in a court with the standards for a proper trial has not been met. Without having their rights read to them when they were captured on fields of battle, there exists a strong case for having charges dropped .
If the President does not reverse his decision and change not just the location of the terrorist trial but the its jurisdiction from a civilian to a military court, than not only will there be an unnecessary severe inconvenience to New Yorkers along with a an unnecessary disruption to commerce but there will be an unnecessarily heightened risk to New Yorkers in addition to a ton of loopholes that could allow these terrorists to walk if the rules of a civilian court are applied to foreign enemies of the state who are captured by non-civilian American forces on the field of battle.
I have stated before that the timing of this civilian trial for enemy combatants that should be tried in a military tribunal will be a major factor in President Obama’s reelection loss in 2012. But that is the least of our concerns, just ask New Yorkers and mayor Bloomberg.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 28 2010 11:25 PM
Thanks Hawk
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 28 2010 11:24 PM
Erock....what the hell are you talking about, you fool. Do you havea hole in your head? What an absolute hypocrite you are. And as usual you prove once again to make no sense, have no ideological bearings, no sebse of committment and absolutely no rhyme or reason. What a fool you are. Keep up your waffling and inane commentary. You'll be ignored even more than you already are.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 28 2010 10:39 AM
I support Kempite today. I would go into detail but lets just say, I do not see an operation in kempites future to remove his nose from Obama 's ass.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 28 2010 2:45 AM
This from
Philly.com
Poll: Toomey over Specter by 14 points
Democrats found to lack enthusiasm
By CHRIS BRENNAN Philadelphia Daily News
brennac@phillynews.com 215-854-5973
Former U.S. Rep. Pat Toomey has opened up a 14-point lead among likely voters in his bid to deny U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter a sixth term, according to the latest Daily News/Franklin & Marshall Poll.
Poll director G. Terry Madonna said that the results reflect a growing national Republican resurgence mixed with a lack of Democratic enthusiasm as the two parties battle over issues like health care and the economy.
Specter, who switched from Republican to Democrat in April, was tied at 30 percent in a general election match-up with Toomey among registered voters, with 35 percent undecided, the poll found.
But Toomey jumped out to a 14- point lead when the poll targeted "likely voters," people who said they are certain to vote and are paying close attention to the race.
Among that group, Toomey led Specter 45-31 percent, with 20 percent undecided.
"I can't deny it's all very encouraging," Toomey said. "But I'm also very aware of the fact that the election is nine months away. A lot can happen. So I'm going to run like I'm 20 points behind."
Specter, who narrowly beat Toomey in the 2004 Republican primary, declined to comment on the poll yesterday.
Toomey, who lives near Allentown, left his congressional seat for the 2004 race.
U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak, who is leaving his Delaware County congressional seat to challenge Specter in the primary, also came up a loser against Toomey in the poll. Toomey led Sestak among registered voters by 28-16 percent with 51 percent undecided.
With likely voters, Toomey's lead on Sestak grew to 41-19 percent with 37 percent undecided.
Sestak was unavailable for comment yesterday, a campaign spokesman said.
The poll found health care, the economy and jobs to be the top issues in the race.
The winner of the May 18 Democratic primary will have to deal with what Madonna calls the "enthusiasm gap."
Madonna notes that 47 percent of the registered Republicans in the poll said that they were likely to vote in the Nov. 2 general election, while only 35 percent of the Democrats felt the same way. He attributes that to national news of Democrats' struggling to implement their policies in Washington despite control of the White House and Congress.
Madonna pointed to Republican wins in races for governor in New Jersey and Virginia last year and in a U.S. Senate race in Massachusetts this month as proof that the GOP is energized and that many Democrats are staying home.
In Pennsylvania's race for governor, Madonna found the candidates so unrecognizable to voters that their current standing in the poll means little.
Seven in 10 people in the poll had no opinion on that race.
"They have no state name recognition," Madonna said of the candidates. "The fact is, the race is in a very inchoate form, a form that has yet to take shape."
The poll showed state Attorney General Tom Corbett leading state Rep. Sam Rohrer 23-5 percent in the Republican gubernatorial primary, with 69 percent undecided.
Allegheny County Executive Dan Onorato led the Democrats with 10 percent while state Auditor General Jack Wagner, Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty and Montgomery County Commissioner Joe Hoeffel each had 4 percent; 72 percent said that they were undecided.
The poll of 1,165 people, conducted from Jan. 18-24, has a margin of error of +/- 2.9 percent.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 27 2010 2:08 PM
As suggested in my State of the G.O.P. adress, the Republican Party must....
Put new blood forward and present new ideas. Let voters know that old guard Republicans are on their way out.
A step in that direction is coming tonight, when Republicans put freshman Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell center stage as he delivers the Republican response to the Prsident's State of the Union Address.
Unlike Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal who lastg year received sour reviews for his response to the President, Governor McDonnell is articulate, energetic, and convincing. He is a perfect model for the new generation of Republicans.
In his Republican retort to the President, the Governor will highlight the fact that it is about time President Obama focus on the economy and jobs but what he still doesn't get is that voters do not want government expanded in an attempt to grow the economy and create jobs. That is an unsustainable growth that will only make matters worse.
Bob McDonnell's address promises to be a statement that will effectively counter what will undoubtedly be a strong speech by President Obama. McDonnell will successfully create doubt about the President's committment to fiscal conservatism and his too little, too late "limited" domestic spending freeze.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 24 2010 12:51 PM
I, C-Mach, endorse kempite in Thursday's Republican runoff.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 12 2010 10:16 PM
I offer my sincere congratulations on your win in the runoff!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 8 2010 10:29 PM
Hub, I'm trying. I figure, the morte I can get on it, the less I will have to say because I will have to do is point people to the section and clause that covers the topic........If it only that was simple. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Jan 8 2010 8:31 PM
Could you make your platform a little longer please? LOL!
Here is a 10 on an excellent platform, whether I agree or not. Also, as a show of solidarity because I know you are one of the ones to initiate bringing this site back to what it was supposed to be. I wholeheartedly support that notion.
Hope that your holiday was good, and that you have a Happy New Year!
Take care.
MF
|
|
|
|