header
Home  ::   Create Blog Entry  ::   Your Blog Entries  ::   View All Blogs

Monday, February 1, 2010

This Week's Political Winners & Losers ---1/25/10 through 1/31/10

kempite
* ~~~ LOSERS ~~~ *


---Chris Matthews

*-After once admitting to having a tingle run up his leg over Barack Obama, the partisan television prognosticator who offers some of the most useless and rambling banter on American airwaves, made a statement that goes down on that Best of Chris Matthews CD or maybe that TV’s Top Ten Bloopers show. After President Obama delivered his fifty or so minute State of the Union address, Matthews gushed “I forgot he was black tonight for an hour. You know, he’s gone a long way to become a leader of this country, and passed so much history, in just a year or two. I mean, it’s something we don’t even think about. I was watching, I said, wait a minute, he’s an African-American guy in front of a bunch of other white people.” Matthews can’t help but spew verbal ejaculations of liberal loving quotes that he is famous for, but it isn’t often that a liberal admits to their preoccupation with race and their racist thoughts. To suggest that Matthews forgot the President was black for one hour indicated that he thinks about President Obama’s color the other 23 hours of everyday. The remark was just another example of talking head stupidity and Chris Matthews proved once and for all that he doesn’t use his head and talks out of his arse. The fact that MSNBC continues to run with this guy made selecting Matthews or MSNBC as one of this week’s losers difficult. It was a close call, but I don’t think any one can truly contest the fact that Matthews is the biggest loser of the two.



---Arlen Specter

*-Arlen Specter spent the past week trying to explain why he was so patronizing to a Congresswoman that he was debating while on a radio talk show. After repeatedly telling Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann to essentially shut up and “act like a lady”, ol’ Arlen helped to demonstrate that he is even more out of touch than we thought. Liberal feminists ignored the remark, but strong, independent women didn’t. Many of them, including Michelle Bachmann await an apology. Not for calling her lady, but for the patronizing tone and context he used the term "act like a lady" in. The suggestion was that as a lady, Bachmann should sit there and listen to Arlen without objection to his accusations. I don’t know about Arlen but I don’t think sharia laws apply to contemporary American women and I would guess Arlen never told his wife to “act like a lady” because if he did, he’d be talking funny with the fat lap he would be walking around with. But things are not going well for Arlen Specter. In addition to acting like Archie Bunker addressing Edith from his armchair, a poll came out and placed him 14 points behind Pat Toomey, his likely Republican opponent for the Senate seat he currently occupies. On top of that, it is becoming more and more clear that this was not the time to be switching parties and trying to latch on to a political label that is sinking faster than the Titanic. Arlen is definitely a loser. Especially this week.



---President Obama

*-Faced with the need to take the focus off of the fact that the American people believe he has not been focusing on the most pressing issues confronting us, President Obama used his first State of the Union to talk out of both sides of his mouth. After using his first year in office to become the most partisan President of out time, spend like a drunken sailor in a liquor store, and really do nothing more for the economy other than increase unemployment, he stood before the nation and chastised Republicans for not being bipartisan enough, and told us how the federal government must tighten its belt end spend less and how we must create jobs. The President’s State of the Union offered a to do list of everything his administration and his policies did not do during his first year in office. But if that did 'nt prove how hypocritical he and his Party is, President Obama spoke of a Christmas tree of tax cuts and even suggested that the he already cut taxes for Americans and that those “tax cuts gave Americans more spending power”. Well here’s a newsflash Mr. President, you campaigned against trickle down economics and you even said you wanted the government to “spread the wealth” through taxes. So which is it? Do you believe that tax cuts help Americans or do you believe that Americans are best off when the government redistributes their wealth? And as far as those tax cuts you claim to have initiated, they were so meager that they were hardly felt. And by the way, allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire is as good as a tax increase. So rather than suggest that you are a tax cutter, you should fess up and admit that you and your party are tax hikers. Unless of course you really believe that tax cuts give Americans more buying power and that more buying power leads to more job. If you do, you will reinstate the Bush tax cuts and make them permanent...... Until the President’s rhetoric matches his deeds, until he really cuts taxes, creates jobs, grows the economy and insures that his Democrat leaders allow Republican leaders to sit at the table, than he is nothing but a loser dragging us all down. This week, all President Obama did was demonstrate how hypocritical he is. So he must be considered one of the week’s losers.



* ~~~ WINNERS ~~~ *




---New York City

*-President Obama and Eric Holder made us all losers when they proved their inability to properly prosecute the War on the Terror but when they made the decision to try five professed terrorists who were involved in 9//11 as civilians, instead of enemy combatants in a military tribunal, the biggest loser was the location where their civilian trial was going to be held………..New York City. The trial would have cost NYC $1 billion, depressed local commerce, put New Yorkers on edge , paralyzed the City’s already congested streets with closures and other delays created by the humongous security that would have been required, and it would risk victimizing New Yorkers from a retaliatory strike sparked by the trial that would have taken place just a few hundred yards away from ground zero. After Mayor Bloomberg changed his mind and urged the President to change his own mind, the President called upon the Justice Department to find another location for the trial. So New York City came out on top this weeks, where it belongs, and is a winner. But what of the municipality that the civilian trial ends up in? Will that town deserve being the target of threats, being harassed by inconveniences and plundered by expenses that a military tribunal would have avoided. Not really but New Yorker’s made sure that it won’t be them. So they are winners.



---ManCrunch

*-Few ever heard of this gay dating site, or probably ever wanted to hear about it, but after putting CBS on the spot and forcing them out of the closet to admit that they would not air their commercial during the Super Bowl because it did not meet the stations standards, word spread like wild fire and a viral marketing success was born. After ticking off the right by rejecting an anti-abortion ad, it was easy to call attention to the network’s rejection of another ad that this time, ticked off the left. The ad had two men kissing in it, and when the people doing the marketing for ManCrunch let it be known that CBS considered it inappropriate to air, people quickly went to the internet to see the commercial for themselves. As they did, CBS quickly became the "Can’t Be Seen Network” and without spending a dime of the millions it costs for an ad to run during the Super Bowl, ManCrunch got more publicity than it ever could have imagined, and for free! And so now you know what ManCrunch is, which is why they are a big winner of the week. They took political correctness and exploited it to their advantage. It was the type of brilliant strategy that could be used in pulling off something as unimaginable as electing a Republican to the US Senate from Massachusetts.



---Indiana Voters and Their State Legislature

*-Indiana has been seeing an incredible tug of war between the state and local municipal governments. As the national economy soured, the state government, under Republican Governor Mitch Daniels, was forced to cut back on the amount of funds it gave to local governments. The state, tightened its belt, but local governments did not. So they turned to raising property taxes. Since 2008 the high trending property tax rates sparked an Indiana uprising of Tea Party protesters and even ousted the Mayor of Indianapolis. So now, taking the bull by the horn, state lawmakers have approved placing a state constitutional amendment on the ballot that would enable state residents to vote on a constitutional Property-Tax Cap. Even though voters understand that this will mean cuts in municipal services, one poll shows them in favor of the cap on property taxes by a margin of 64%. So this week both the voters of Indiana and their state legislature are winners. Not only do they talk about belt tightening and limited government, they are taking steps to insure it. Now, if national Democrats, as well as national Republicans can learn that leson, maybe we will all be better off.



http://politics247.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/the-weeks-political-winners-losers-for-125-131-2010/
Share
Post Comment:

Comments

Once again kempite shows class.......
Wiz, see my blog entitled, "CBS Screwed By Two Men Kissing". I clearly state that I see nothing wrong with the ad, especially compared to other commercials out there. But at the same time I understand the lack of acceptance for alternative relationships that exists, especially when people feel like it is being pushed on them. In my blog I also point out that I stand by CBS' right to decide what they want to air, so long as it meets FCC regulations, and I stand by their right to not air what they want. I respect the fact that they are a private company and since I do not own it, the decision is not mine.....like it or not. I think it was a little hasty of you to insinuate that I would consider this a homsexual win or that I would place homosexuality above the constituiton or that I would place my homosexuality before my being an American. I realize that although I may be gay, it is my Americanism which allows me to be a gay man who is free toi live my life as I wish. That is why I respect CBS' decision. There is no need to explain to me about perceptions of normalcy, I understand that my relationship with my partner may not be normal to you or others and I would have expected you to understand that about me by now. I will say this though, had this ad been accepted by CBS, because it did meet FCC standards, would you have been as accepting of that decision as I am of this decision? Would you have denied CBS the right to air what they want so long as it met with FCC standards? I did, and I did without any animosity.
As for this Man Crunch thing. Its a bit rediculous. But you Kempite have to think about the old people and children watching this on TV. If my grandpa was still alive, and I was watching the Super Bowl. I would hate for it to be ruined by a rediculous situation like two men touching a bowl of potato chips and then spontaneously making out. He would be confused. And so would children watching the program. I see so much in media now pushing the boundries of sexual relations for a cheap prank. IF you see this as some sort of homosexual win, then I think you are being just mischevious or are just daft. It was only a few years ago that Janet Jacksons Nubian breast was exposed for a half a second the the FCC went ape shit. What is normal to you is not wholesome to most. But it isn't even normal or wholesome to have some gag perpetuate as situation that would never happen. Can't we leave super bowl commercials to drunken beer guys, funny monkeys and drunken beer guys. Football is gay enough without the gay shit. I have said my peice. The Wiz.
Yes, maditude.
Yes, maditude.
Very good, Kemp.. especially the Matthews comment. I think the tingling down his leg is now rotting his brain. This must be one of the twenty-three hours that he remembers Obama is "a black man."
Right, kempite and Smashey!
Right, kempite and Smashey!
Once again, Anon, for the retarded proponents and those who drink the 'party of no' kool-aid: The Democrats had enough votes on their own to pass anything they wanted without a fillibuster and FAILED to do so. The only obstruction that kept the votes from happening came from the Democrats. They could have done it alone, tried to and failed miserably.
I do agree with BD up, to a point. I believe that conservative should be willing to discuss healtcare reform with Democrats and that Democrats should try to at least act bi-partisan by letting Republicans sit at the table, but not to considere universal programs, but to have them consider proper and effective reforms such as portability, tort reform and the willingness to let state governments to experiment with the best solutions for their needs.
real conservatives want NO universal healthcare period. and any "republican" that is willing to talk about it is not a conservative at all.
The republicans had their chance C-match. You donot get to whine about not being able to sit at the big kid table when you did everything possible to obstruct the process. Now you want to talk? To friggin bad.....
MESSAGE START. REPUBLICANS TO DEMOCRATS: IMPORTANT: If you want US to be bi-partisan, YOU need to let us in to the official discussion of the Health Care bill. If you don't, that will just ruin your credibility. MESSAGE STOP. For those of you who don't know what I'm talking about, I'm talking about the backroom closed-door meetings between Democrats discussing the Health Care bill without Republican involvement.

recent