header
Home  ::   Create Blog Entry  ::   Your Blog Entries  ::   View All Blogs

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

The Truth Is Hard To Accept And In The Case Of Iran, Few Do

kempite
Some realities are so disturbing that we would rather not deal with them. This habit tends to be a political phenomenon that we often encounter and that we often pay a dear price for.

For decades our federal government has refused to face the harsh realities of deficit spending. They just can’t find it in themselves to deny their spending habits and tighten our federal belt. Unless we eventually legitimately confront the reality of runaway deficit spending and face the unpleasant facts that we can’t continue to spend what we don’t have for much longer, we will soon have a rude awakening. All because we did not want to face the facts.

World Wars I and II were realities that we did not want to have anything to do with. Woodrow Wilson spent the years 1914 through 1917 trying to not have anything to do with the war. An American population that had no desire to be a part of what was happening “over there” also wanted to stay out of it. Their fears of the possibility of Americans getting involved in World War I even drove Woodrow Wilson to, in 1914, draw up a declaration of neutrality. He even urged Americans not to take any sides. In 1916 a grateful American electorate reelected Wilson on the slogan “he kept us out of war”.

A year later, American was at war. After neutrality did not prevent Germans from killing Americans, Wilson turned around and stated that we were going to be a part of World War I in an attempt to fight a “a war to end all wars” and to make “the world safe for democracy”.

Our need to defend ourselves and our interests were inevitable. We just didn’t want to face the truth.

As Franklin Delano Roosevelt presided over our nation, he and most Americans again did not want to be involved in the war “over there”. Our allies begged on hands on knee, but we refused to officially get involved. We did however try to covertly help our allies like Great Britain. Although we did not want to fight, we knew how important it was for our allies to not go down in defeat. So we offered minimal, under the table, support.

And then Japan attacked and killed what was up to then, the most devastating foreign attack on America ever.

A short time later, we were not just fighting in World War II, we were leading the war effort.

There is often question as to just how much history would have been altered had we put our muscle into these fights before it was too late and could no longer deny the facts. There is also question as to just how much, our leaders and we the people, as a nation, have learned from past denials.

Today, our war weary nation wants nothing more than to put an end to conflict. Whether you are a Republican or a Democrat, we want the war in Afghanistan to be over and our military involvement in Iraq to be done. The only difference there is that some want to end when we have achieved our goal and eliminated the threats that sent us there in the first place, while others just want us out of the two countries at any cost. I happen to be a party to the former school of thought. I also happen to be of the school of thought that, as troubling and unpleasant as some realities are, we, as a nation, can not sweep them under the rug. By doing so, we will eventually trip over what sweep there and fall.

Currently an unpleasant reality that we must confront is Iran.

Put aside for a moment their nuclear ambitions. For a moment, don’t even consider the Iranian Presidents stated desire to push Israel off in to the sea. Let us ignore for a brief second the possible threats that we don’t want to deal with. Instead let us just look at the existing threats that we are dealing with right now—–threats that we do not want to acknowledge because the truth of them happening creates “a reality so disturbing that we would rather not deal with it”.

In Iraq and Afghanistan, the greatest threats and challenge to our missions being completely accomplished are insurgents. These are extremist rebels who seek to engage the democratic installed governments of the two nations in battle and ultimately overthrow them. We have long known that Iran is providing many of these insurgents. Not only are they providing the actual rebels, they are also supplying them with explosives and other military hardware.

This is a point made quite obvious in a recent article in AsiaTimes.com entitled Afghans Fear Infiltration From Iran.

In it, the authors document the events in a tiny border town between Iran and Afghanistan named Islam Qala. The article details the ease in which Iranian insurgents are helping the Taliban to defeat the American born democracy behind the new Afghan government.

Take a moment to review this account of Iranian involvement. And then understand this. The ugly truth in what we must confront is the only way we can assure a success with any longevity in Afghanistan and Iraq. The truth of the disturbing realities Iran confronts us with are so undesired that I will not even bring myself to state the harsh truth of what we must do. Read the Asia Times article that I reference and link to here and draw your own conclusions. But before you do remember what Wilson and Roosevelt wanted to believe and then remember what they had to do.



http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KK13Df03.html
Share
Post Comment:

Comments

LOL Thanks Kemp
I understand Erock, I just feel that inthat this most historically trobled region of the world the balance of power is unequal for many imperfect reasons and I accept that in an imperfect world not everything can be as we would like. But when it comes to us or them, I believe that America has a responsibility to us, not them. Good night Mr. President....may visions of F-22's fly in your head....lol
I think we all know that unless these talks with Iran work out what an end result will be. And while yes I am willing to let Israel do alot of things I think that as a responsable nation they could do as we do and many other nations do and abide by the same treaty that we expect all other nuclear nations to abide by. Anyways I am off.
Erock, did I say bomb Iran? Nope, I didn't. I do not want to go war with Iran. It scaresthe hell out of me. That is why we must do much more than we currently are to avoid that from happening and the truth is, that it does not matter what Israel does. Iran will still be a threat. But the other thing I note is that Isreal's security situation is unlike any other in the world. This helps to account for some of the unfair advantages and leeway that they have and that we give them.
I don't care about what Iran thinks is fair I care about what we think is fair Also all of our allies last I checked are part of the non proliferation treaty though Pakistan may not be. I am not ignoring the real world but I am hesitant to just start to bomb another nation when we are stuck in aother.
Is it fair. Maybe not. But since when did the honorable Iranian regime become concerned with what is fair. Is their lack of a non-proliferation agreement ideal or even pleasing, nope its not. But does anyone think that would make a difference to Iran? Sorry it wouldn't and as a nation in a particularly unique national security predicament, although I do not appreciate the lack of a non-proliferation treaty with Isreal, I am also not worried about the threat they pose to us or our allies. So no, it is not ideal but it is real. It is also simple. Isreal---trust. Iran---distrust. Isreal----not a threat. Iran----a threat. You could try to raise all the fairness doictrines you want but when a gun is being pointed at your head, your treaty won't stop the bullet. This is reality not the perfect order of one world under Obama, with uniformity and insufferable for all. Thgis is the real world and if you wish to ignore it, you can, but I won't
Im not saying anything but the US does not sneak dirty bombs either and we are part of the non proliferation treaty. In fact most nations are.
Call it what you want. But I am not worried about three Jews flying a packed airliner into the Empire State Building and Sears Tower just after 9:00 a.m on a Tuesday morning. Kid yourselvesd all you want but the joke is on you. Nor am I worried about the Massad and the Israeli government sneaking a dirty bomb on the A train during rush hour. You can pretend that by placating extremists who promise a jihad to kill the great satan (American)will make it all better but I don't. Sorry. Well, not really. I'm not sorry-----I'm right.
Actually the Saudis never thought about getting nukes till Iran did. But I think the WW I comparison is off and I would like to know why Israel is not part of the non prolifleration treaty.
Perhaps if Israel got rid of their nuclear weapons Iran would not feel the need to do the same? It is not our job to police the world and it never was. Thomas Jefferson said it best when he stated that we should have "commerce with all nations, alliance with none." War is the reason for the budget deficit and the huge national debt. Because we don't have the money to spend policing the world we are in this huge hole. If anyone is a threat to another nation it is us. We invaded Iraq for no reason and we gave Saddam the chemical weapons that many Iranians are still suffering from to this very day. We are in Iran's back yard. It is no wonder they are wanting to beef up their military ... but also nuclear energy is an important source of energy. Many of the people that argue that nuclear energy is one of the safest forms of energy in this country are the same people that are arguing that Iran shouldn't be allowed to use nuclear energy. You can't have it both ways. Where are the calls to dismantle Israels nuclear weapons? Your argument is hypocritical. Israel constantly threatens Iran and has even bombed them. If Iran bombed Israel's nuclear facilities to get rid of them I am sure you would be willing to go to war. That is pretty hypocritical.

recent