header
Home  ::   Create Blog Entry  ::   Your Blog Entries  ::   View All Blogs

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Some Advice For Tea Party Patriots. CHANGE THINGS FROM THE INSIDE, OUT!!!!!!

kempite
This weekend, the largely informal Tea Party movement attempts to take a step toward becoming a formal organization. Thousands are gathering in Tennessee for the Tea Party’s first national convention and begin to organize innumerable numbers of citizens who are dissatisfied with the direction our government has been, and is, going in.

Although the Tea Party movement is new, the anti-government sentiment that motivates those in it, is not new. There has always been an anti-establishment and “they’re all alike” component that has motivated people and inspired attempts to create “third parties”. The most recent one to have come closest to, but still fall short of success was sponsored and headed up by H. Ross Perot in 1992. In his first bid for the presidency, Perot’s near 19% of the vote earned him no electoral votes but did essentially throw the election to Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton.

Third parties do not have a good track record in the United States. That is in large part due to the fact that we have a two Party system. It is not solely a two Party system, but it essentially is. Even so, there do exist many official third parties. Take a state like New York. There in addition to Democrats and Republicans you have four other major parties. There is the Liberal Party, the Conservative Party, the libertarian Party and the Right To Life Party.

There are even more than that, but those are the four most prominent. They often run their own candidates but more often than not, they cross endorse candidates.

For instance a Democrat may occasionally be found also running on the Conservative line. Usually, the Republican is endorsed by the Conservative Party and the Democrat is endorsed by the Liberal Party. On many occassions, Republicans run on the Conservative and Right To Life lines. These crossed endorsed candidacies have the total vote on the Republican line added to the total votes that they get on the Right To Life and Conservative Party lines.

What this essentially does is give individuals who can’t get themselves to pull the lever for a Republican, the opportunity to vote for the Republican, but on the Conservative or Right To Life line.

This is how Rudy Giuliani became Mayor of overwhelmingly Democrat New York City.

He won the Republican nomination but there were far too many New Yorkers who refused to ever vote Republican, even if they did like Rudy. So what did he do? He got enough signatures to create a third Party line called the “Independent Fusion Party.”

It was that line that gave Rudy enough votes to win, because the total he received on the Republican line would never have been enough to elect him.

But the point to all this is that regardless of these third party entities that may exist, they more often than not, align themselves with either the Republican or the Democrat candidate. Why? Because we are essentially a two Party nation. For some of us the two Parties represent clear differences. To some of us, it is not so much Republican or Democrat as it is right or wrong. It is that clear cut. For others, both Parties are the same. These angry voters are today calling themselves Tea Party members.

And so at their convention, they are organizing.

For those who could afford the exorbitantly high priced tickets that are required for each of the events at their convention, they are being offered workshops such as “How to do Voter Registration Drives and Where to Find Conservative Votes” & “Women in Politics” or a workshop sponsored by the Young Americans for Freedom called “How to Involve the Youth in the Conservative Movement”. Training in these areas are crucial for any movement so I commend the organizers of the Tea Party convention for understanding what needs to be done to be a successful activist.

But my question to all these new activists and their newfound enthusiasm is ………Where the hell have you been??

Why did it take elected Republicans who went astray and the most left leaning, socialist admiring, wealth spreading, President in history, to wake you up and get you up off of your collective arses?

And now that you have finally woken up to the fact that we are losing our country and shredding its Constitution, what are you doing?

You’re trying to take the same historic path to failure that others who believe the grass is greener on some imaginary third side of the street took. And that is despite the fact that you know there are only two sides to a street.

I find myself greatly frustrated by the new awakening that suddenly has millions of people saying “hey, wait a minute, that isn’t right” or “Hey, can they do that”. What “they” have been doing hasn’t been right for years, but your lack of civic responsibility allowed it to get to where it is today.

Which brings me to the direction I advise that Tea Party activists take.

Now that our government has your attetion, use the Tea Party Convention well. Be inspired by its speakers. Absorb the organizational knowledge being provided in the truly useful workshops that the convention offers. Then take that inspiration and knowledge and do what you should have started doing a long time ago. Apply that organizational ability and activism into taking over the two Parties that exist. Make those Parties the political organization that represent what you want them to represent, not what the establishment political class wants it to stand for.

Start at the local level.

Whether you know it or not, there are elections held that elect your local Republican or Democrat Leaders. The first subset of leaders are your local committeemen. One man and one woman within small sections of your neighborhood are elected by the registered voters of the respective Parties who live in that area. They are usually called “election districts”. The people who win the election in their respective election district or precinct, then become municpal or district committeemen. At the same time, there is also usually an election for either district leaders or Municipal Chairmen. These people organize the district or municipality represented by district or precinct committeemen. In some cases these leaders are not voted on in the general election but by the town or precinct committeemen who were elected by the voters in a general election.

District Leaders or Municipal Chairs then organize their committeemen and together they select County Chairmen. This occurs at a county convention where the county committeemen elect the County Chairmen.

As we climb the organizational pyramid, at a state Party convention, County Chairmen elect a State Chairman and at national conventions, State Chairmen elect a national Chairman.

This is how the Parties, that Tea Party protestors so despise, organize.

Now if only these Tea Party Patriots participated in that process, they could be controlling the Parties and stop being controlled by the Parties.

It should also be known that in many cases, the same process that elects the Party leadership, also takes place in regards to the official endorsement process of candidates. In many cases, it is how nominees of the respective Parties are selected when local, county or state offices open up, especially in the event of seats that become vacant. In those cases, the same process that elected your district or municipal chairmen will select the nominee who will run in a special State Senate, State Assembly or City Council election.

Understanding this process is essential to any Tea Party Patriot.

By understanding the methodology involved, instead of trying to build a third side to a street, you can rebuild the existing side that you prefer and make it into what you want.

If you can get Tea Party Patriots elected to County Committeemen positions, you can put into office the Republican or Democrat Party leader of your municipality. Elect Tea Party Patriots to Municipal Chairmen positions and they can elect the Tea Party protestors that they want to be Republican or Democrat County Chairs. From there you do the same with State Chairmen and ultimately the Chairmen of the Democrat and Republican National Committees. It is also how you effect and in many cases select the candidates for state assembly, state senate, Governor, Congress, and the Senate.

If you were apart of that process, you could shape your party platform, you could also be a part of the screening process that endorses candidates and throws the full weight of the Party establishment behind those endorsed candidates. If you were a part of that process, you would be the establishment and you would be able to eventually take credit for electing people who will take this country in the direction that you want to see it go in.

So my advice to Tea Party Patriots is this. Change things from the inside out. Energize, stay angry and motivated, stay focused and become a part of the process instead of fighting the process and succumbing to the failure of all other third Parties.

Do you want to cross endorse or throw your weight behind the establishment’s candidates or do you want be the candidates that others cross endorse and help? Don’t fight with the political Parties………..

TAKE THEM OVER AND MAKE THEM REPRESENT YOU AND WHAT YOU WANT THEM TO REPRESENT!!!!



http://politics247.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/advice-to-tea-party-patriots-change-things-from-the-inside-out/
Share
Post Comment:

Comments

Sounds about right. not surprised at all by that.
to quote the blog www.lewrockwell.com "I have been watching bits and snatches of the “Tea Party Convention” on C-SPAN. My initial response is much the same as Gertrude Stein’s impression of Oakland: “there’s no ‘there’, there.” My suspicion is that this group may be but a neo-con/Establishment inspired effort to neutralize widespread popular disaffection with the political system; to attract attention away from a frontal critique of the state (e.g., Ron Paul, LRC, some Leftist commentators) and into a kind of mushy, make-believe “reform” movement reminiscent of Frank Chodorov’s observation concerning those who want “to clean up the whorehouse, but keep the business intact.” I have thus far heard no principled, fundamental assessment of the state from these tea-partyers, but only a lot of superficial jabber about “taking back America.”
I feel the same about Liberals, even those who call themselves Republicans. I am also excited aboyt Toomey but I must admit that I know absolutely about the Pennsylvania gubernatorial race yet.
i hate liberal, i don't care what party they are in. i only thank god that pat toomey is going to be my new senator and i hope that Sam Roher can defeat that pinko Corbett for the gubernatorial nomination
Good man, BD. How to wage the war for maintaining the founding principles of the country is not over your head.
the only way to get a third party is to collapse the major party. i am curently overthrowing my local committee and with allies thruogh out the county will take over the party thru the committeeperson elections. patrick murphy doesn't know what is going to hit him!
The Republican Party was a third party once. People joined the Republican Party because they were tired of the Whigs and the Democrats.
Thank you, Big Daddy. That I believe is my point. I could be wrong about a truly viable "Third Party" becoming a reality, but I do not believe I am wrong about human nature and it eventually becoming considered "the same as the rest". But if the anger out there is sincere and if the people who are angry are sincere about the principles they stand for, than they must be among those, as you say, "independent insurgence" who enact change into the major parties.
for the most part Tea Parties are filled with wannabe fiscal conservatives. they are the same dopes that would bastardize Obama for his 700 billion dollar bail out, then justify to themselves that McCain only voted for it as a desparate measure. they will collapse and continue to blindly support the lesser of two evils as they have always. it will be independent insurgence into the major parties that will enact any change. until you say no, the DNC and RNC will continue business as usual.
Getting back to the premise of your blog, which I believe was change within the party vs. starting a third party. I am 45 years old. Two parties have had power in my entire life. In my 45 years of living, the budget has increased at a higher rate than inflation 45 times. We have had deficit spending 45 times. We have had increases in the deficit 41 times. (I'll give the Republican Congress from 1995-99 credit for reducing deficits during the Clinton administration.)
Now you arfe being obtuse. You just finished explaining to me how Libertarians lose their principles and I just finished explaining, at length, how it is human nature that allows principles to be diluted through the process. So as I have stated for three years, it is not the Parties that are the problem, it is human nature. As I stated and as you even admitted to, when momentum and power is within reach, human nature takes over and deals are arranged and compromises are made. And so as I stated for three years, it is not the two parties, it is the people and all that comes with human nature thagt is the problem. And as I have stated here for three years, that problem will exist with any Party, no matter how many you create. You even admitted it about the Libertarian Party. The answer is the quality of people that we elect. If Tea Party Prostestors are uniquely above human nature and unparralled in their principles, than if they do as I suggest, and they can be restore the principles to the parties that we feel they lack.
If Republican principles caused them to lose in 2006 and 2008, then why should I vote for a Republican?
Maditude.....EXACTLY! And why do you think thast is? Is it because once you register as Democrat or a Libertarian or a Republican, you have a labotomy and autoimatically have yor principles removed? Or is the human nature that takes over when individuals try to have their principles applied in reality? You keep making my point.
Kemp, the same thing happens to the Republicans and the Democrats. If the GOP is so principled, then why did they lose Congress in 2006 and the White House in 2008?
Aha!........and there in lies the problem. You just admitted what I have argued on U4Prez for three years. When people do get power, human nature takes over. You just admitted yourself that Libertarians, as a Party, and as principled as they project themselves to be, lose their principles when it comes to trying to turn momentum into victory and the practical application of their principles get quite diluted. This is why I state that , holier than thou, "Third Party Independents" act as though if "they" had the reigns of power, "things would be different". As I have always stated, power, greed, deal making, ego's and the "group think" mentality will not make them any different than, "those other parties". It is human nature that gives politics a bad name, not politicasl Parties. As for attacks from Party members, if the Party is comprised of a majority of people that think diffently than someone, yes they will be challenged. However, if you make up the majority of the people, you can be the one challenge those who think differently than you. Of course, as I contend, even if Tea Party Patriots took over both Partie's, as they tried to instill their beliefs, in order for them to get those beliefs institutued, they will have to get enough votes to pass them. This will take deal making and making compromises that will give them a working majority. If Tea Party Patriots took over both Parties or even if they became a successful majority third Party of their own, in 5 years time, people will be saying "they're just like all the other Parties". That said, if you want to advance your principles in American politics, the best shot you have is taking over the major Parties and having them stand for what you want them to. That is the bottom line.
People have tried to change things from the inside out, but that method has failed also. Erock gets attacked from Republicans as much if not more from Republicans as he does from Democrats. People who try to change the party from the inside also get the "RINO" or "DINO" tags on them. The problem with third parties (like the Libertarian Party) is that they gain a little momentum and they think sacrificing principles for votes will help the cause. This did not work in 2008 as Bob Barr received fewer votes for President than a principled libertarian like Michael Badnarik.

recent