header
Home  ::   Create Blog Entry  ::   Your Blog Entries  ::   View All Blogs

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

STYLISH AND EFFECTIVE, PRESIDENT OBAMA ADDRESSES CONGRESS

Last night, President Obama delivered a powerful speech that focused on bipartisanship and counted on the hope that the poor performance of the private sector over the past two years has forced people to have more faith in government and want more government action.

Undeniably well received, the speech was also undeniably expected.

President Obama believes that government is the answer to all our problems and although he made a point of stating that he does not believe in bigger government, he never backed away from more government control . In fact three extraordinary government based goals were punctuated in President Obama’s speech. One was for a government run universal health care project that is akin to LBJ’s expansion of social economic welfare in the 60’s.

Another lofty target laid out was the President’s cap and trade regulations on carbon. That well intended environmental goal will revolutionize our economy and produce some economic winners and many losers and, at best negligible, environmental results.

The final foray into change offered by President Obama was his initiatives which would put education in the domain of government and under its control from the elementary level through the college level.

However, in the Republican response to the President, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal reminded us that the strength in America’s future lays not in government but our people.

Acknowledging the fact that Washington must lead, Jindal made it clear that more money and power in the hands of Washington is not leadership.

Despite the trappings of Washington power and the deserved traditional pomp and circumstances of the Presidency, Governor Jindal presented his case under less impressive circumstances than the President, but his message was as resounding as the Presidents.

Governor Jindal addressed the need to stabilize housing markets, increase energy efficiency and the use of alternative energy sources, and the need to grow our economy. But his approach to those efforts did not rely on the government bureaucracy which has proven itself unable to effectively deliver services, monitor itself or act with speed and efficiency.

Having to follow President Obama in a response, Bobby Jindal faced a daunting task. He needed to deliver a response that could appropriately counter the President and although the grandiosity of his oration may not have met the emotional height of President Obama’s, the content did.

One speech relied on the collective will, determination and stamina of the people. The other relied on government replacing individual will, determination and stamina with a bureaucracy.

Jindal’s response was not made an easier by the fact that President Obama is undeniably one of our greatest contemporary political orators Any message that the President delivers is likely to strike a chord in the hearts and minds of citizens. Much the same way that Ronald Reagan did when he ruled the bully pulpit.

Both Obama and Reagan have used the bully pulpit quite effectively. The difference between the two though, existed in content.

President Obama uses the bully pulpit to promote government as the key to the success of our people.

President Reagan used the bully pulpit to promote our people as the key to the success of our government.

President Obama sees government as the tool which people are empowered by while President Reagan saw people are the source to any power that the government is given.

It is a point noted when we look at the content of President Obama’s speech.

In it, government is the source of our success. Through incremental moves to socializing medicine, education and industry, under the leadership of President Obama, things will improve. In his speech, the source to a sustainable success is the bureaucracy which has proven itself to be slow, cumbersome, unruly, ineffective and inefficient. We are to believe that a government which can’t control itself or monitor itself is suppose to be the source of our wealth.

This is the same government that operates a postal service that is in the red, and has to increase rates while cutting services.

Yet, according to President Obama, government is the answer.

Bobby Jindal’s response to President Obama stated the opposite and although he lacked the suspense and emotion of the President, the content of his speech spoke to the fact that government bureaucracy holds no candle to the power of a free people. He spoke to the principles that our nation was founded on. The principles that we will have to someday struggle to recapture as we slowly move away from a people driven government to a government driven people.

In his address, governor Jindal stated that where Republicans agree with the President, we “must be his most ardent supporters.” With that I agree. However; I fear that that the President’s incremental adoption of the socialist policies that America has long fought against will provide little opportunity to demonstrate any ardent support.
Share
Post Comment:

Comments

Simple soulition Progrees make healthcare affordable by 86ing ungodly insurance for doc to be in buisness and voila!! visit fees go back to $40 or so. I remember $18 a visit and $25 for a x-ray
I liked the Teddy Roosevelt reference in his speech where he was talking about health care. Many people do not realize that Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican, was for healthcare reform; and even had it on his Bull Moose platform in 1912.
Invent a belly button wiper so they can see where they are going. You will make about 200 million or so if you charge a buck apiece
*heads.But you get the point-Americans are retarded morons
What`s even sadder is that next election Americans will still have their heas so far up their asses they still won`t realize the wrong choice.
If Obama has his way the government will control every level of our lives right down to how many kids we are allowed
My response would have included, "President Obama wants to increase government involvement in health care, housing and education. It is government involvement that has artificially inflated the price of health care, housing, and education. It is getting to the point where these things are no longer affordable for middle-class Americans, despite of the increased money government throws at these areas..."
Then they get what hey deserve. Too bad all of us have to pay for unwise decisions made by voters that don't know any better than to trust a con man.
Evidently, sadly, most people accept those qualifications.
to bad he has absoluly no qualifications as US president , (unless you count organized crime as a qualification)
To be honest, the speech was the same speech every president gives. It was delivered well but I think we have established that Obama is top of his class when it comes to delivery. Jindal had a good message but noone knows what the message was, the delivery was so bad I found myself feeling sorry for him. Back to the Obama speech, great delivery but pie in the sky crap. Every president is going to fix education, save the planet from global warming or climate change or what ever the hell they are calling it these days, every president is going to fix social security and lower the drop out rate and make sure everyone can aford to go to college. Every state of the union address I can remember covers these issues yet, we are still "fixing" the same problems. Soaring rhetoric will not solve the problems we face. The top 2% of wage earners cannot pay for all of his wish list. Anyway.... great delivery but low on substance.

recent