header
Home  ::   Create Blog Entry  ::   Your Blog Entries  ::   View All Blogs

Sunday, February 8, 2009

A REAL ECONOMIC RECOVERY PACKAGE DOESN'T ROB US BLIND

As the senate discusses how to construct a package that will get enough support from congress to become law, the Republican National Committee's newly elected Chairman, Mike Steele, took to the airwaves to discuss options.

Taking Republicans back to their economic roots, Steele reminds us that the fastest way to stimulate the economy is to empower the people and take less money away from the people in the first place.

Although Republicans should not object to a package geared at stimulating the economy, they are right to object to a bill that is designed to spend money simply for the sake of spending and that is exactly what the bill in question has become, a free for all, spending bill. Republicans are right to deny support for a bill that is directed at filling the pockets of special interests while emptying the pockets of taxpayers.

One example of the questionable spending in this so-called stimulus package, raised by Chairman Steele, is an amount of $45 million dollars for the creation of trails for all terrain vehicles.

It is just one of many spending inclusions that help to bring this bill, intended for economic recovery, to its staggering final total.

Although wasteful spending is not what ushered in the credit crunch that led to the financial crisis we are in, it does not help matters. Wasteful spending only exacerbates matters. It leads to more taxes which in turn leads to less spending and less spending does not help to stimulate the economy. Less spending and less economic growth does not increase employment and none of it boosts our economy.

All of this indicates that an economic stimulus package packed with wasteful spending is not an answer to our problems. Such a package can only make matters worse and prolong the economic downturn we are experiencing.

That is not to say that the government cannot help. It can. Our government needs to create a package that is aimed at one goal and one goal only. Stimulate the economy.

Currently, under the guise of recovery, legislators are throwing in spending suggestions that are designed more at gaining favor from special interest groups in their home districts than at assisting the American people at large.

Instead of helping to secure our national economic future, many of them are trying to secure a substantial financial donation from special interest groups for their reelection.

That is why much of the spending in this bill does little if anything to "stimulate" the economy at anytime within the immediate future.

A more rational approach to a stimulus package could result in a far less expensive spending bill. A more rational approach to the stimulus package would contain more and larger, immediate, short term tax cuts that allow people to keep and spend more of their own money, while the government enters into some cost saving measures of its own.

In fact the first line of a stimulus package that intends to to spend money should start off with a repeal of the 2.8 percent, automatic pay raise that congress has accepted.

Without a repeal of that measure, the House of Representatives and the Senate can not be taken seriously.

Without their willingness to accept the fact that we are living through tough economic times and that they too must share in a collective national sacrifice, they can not be counted on or trusted to take up solutions to our problems seriously.

Many of the spending measures in the current package have no right to be considered in an omnibus bill like this one. Many of the proposed spending measures in this bill should stand alone and be voted on separately and in their own right.

What should be included in an omnibus stimulus package are those measures which will:

1. -reduce the cost to operate government
2. -free up legitimate and rational credit in the free market place
3. -enhance public infrastructure, transportation and energy needs.

The purpose of the third aspect to any serious stimulus package directly helps the economy in both the short and the long term and spending in each of the three categories mentioned, infrastructure, transportation and energy, will directly relate to increased employment in the United States.

Barring cost saving measures, freeing up credit and limiting spending to public energy, transportation and infrastructure initiatives, the economic stimulus package need not include extras for hobbyists, lobbyists and other special interests.

Under the liberal leadership of the liberal controlled federal government, we are witnessing the construction of a bill that takes advantage of the economic crisis rather than ease the economic crisis.

Since 2004 Republicans have slowly but surely lost their roots of fiscal responsibility and conservatism.

Since 2006 voters have been cleaning house and ridding us of those Republicans who have gone astray and now in, 2009, remaining Republican lawmakers are faced with a defining moment.

Will they rollover and participate in a reckless, historic bill that takes advantage of our problems or will they stand firm and put forth an alternative solution that harkens back to our original principles and beliefs that demonstrate that government is not the solution but rather the problem?

Either way, the first step starts with a bill that repeals the pay raise that they have so willingly accepted.

Share
Post Comment:

Comments

And while we are comparing the two, it's odd how both their families became rich: By doing business with the Nazi's in the early days of WW II.
Well, for one, I give a sh1t about Ted Kennedy, he gave over 40 years of his life to public service. He is a champion for many liberal causes, these days being for universal health care. I am in no way comparing W with Ted as human beings, but if you're going to talk about lily-white privileged doughboys getting where they are by connections and not by hard work, let's at least be fair about it. Both parties are jampacked with doughboys. Obama, though, ain't no doughboy.
who gives a shit' about Kennedy? Second I would take Kennedy over Bush 7 days a week and twice on Sunday, and third Bush is a fucking' DUNCE of galactic proportions!!
Yeah, but Arjay, Bush is pretty fuckin stupid.
Yeah, and Ted Kennedy is only a Senator from Massachusetts because his last name was Kennedy, and while I honor the man himself, it's real easy to say he gravy-trained off his dead brothers' legacies.
Bush only went to Harvard because his last name was Bush, that degree was bought and paid for by Daddy Bush, Obama on the other hand EARNED his DEGREE!!!
That is a reason why I was seduced by Obama, because he didn't live an upper-class childhood. He didn't get into an Ivy League school because of connections. He worked for everything he had. He doesn't call the poor lazy, only people without a real point of reference do that. No one who lived with any degree of deprivation would wish it on others or deem those with fewer blessings are somehow a bunch of undesirables.
Atleats Obama grew up poor. Hopefully that turns out to mean something to him.
Bush received his MBA from Harvard. If you had an opened mind, you would see that Obama is Bush's third term.
Sure Mad, I could have voted along with the 3 other people who voted for the other clowns, Ron Paul, Baldwin ect. No thanks, I like President Obama and his Magna cum laude degree from Harvard.
I felt I had to vote in the last election. We couldn't afford President Palin.
Liberal, I am not a Republican...Both parties are wrong and you are a dolt for voting for either a Republican or a Democrat.
great another republi-turd who screams bloody hell' now, but where were you when Bush and the republicans EXPANDED GOVERNMENT to levels not seen since WWII??? Where were your crys when Bush never vetoed ONE spending Bill while the Republicans where in charge? Now of course Republi-turds are crying because the Democrats are in charge, so it IS TOTALLY POLITICAL, as to why republi-turds are blocking Obama's rescue plan!!
I would also like to add that one reason why the economy is where it is comes from debt and interest that we have to pay back due to perpetual overspending. This year's payment for prior debt and interest amounts to $300 billion. This is money that will not stimulate the economy. As we accumulate more debt in the future, this will take more money away from the economy and we will have this situation again.
Kemp, it would help if the politicians would pay their fair share of taxes. This will save embarrassment at confirmation hearings. I am against government spending as a guise to stimulate the economy, but I fully support tax cuts.