header
Home  ::   Create Blog Entry  ::   Your Blog Entries  ::   View All Blogs

Monday, January 12, 2009

TAXPAYERS TO CONGRESS "DON'T EVEN CONSIDER ACCEPTING A RAISE!"

The new year will give us a new President and a newly elected Congress. Only 61 individuals are truly newly elected to it though. The remaining 474 are simply returning to continue their work (two are moving from the house to the senate). But in this session, all of them are expected to bring about that much "touted change" that many of them promised along with President-Elect Obama.

How much "change" they will actually bring and what kind of change they will be responsible for has yet to be seen but early on, there exists one change that they will effect right away.

While the nation and the world have entered into economic troubles, the 535 collective members of the House of Representatives and Senate will have the opportunity to see their salaries change with an increased of as much as $4,700 a year.

The pay raise is automatic and turns out to be about a 2.8% increase and although it may not sound like much, when one considers the circumstances of the times that we are in, accepting such pay raise would be criminal.

I say criminal because there do not exist many American institutions that can determine their own salary at their own whim. And there are even fewer institutions that would dare to accept more money when they have less money to spend.

On top of that, given the fact that elected federal office holders already make a touch more than $169,000, most Americans feel that that is quite suitable. In fact many Americans might consider it to be a great deal more than suitable. Seeing as how Congress currently has an approval rating of 18.4% and a disapproval rating of 73.4%, I would say that most Americans think that $170,000 for the bad job they are doing is totally inappropriate and way too much.

So why should they get almost $5,000. More for their poor approval?

Even more disturbing, how can they look voters in the eye and claim to understand that the economic climate is rough but that it is necessary for them to shoulder additional costs that Congress had a hand in creating in the first place.

While Congress approves bailing out almost every faction of the private sector that requests help, how can they also accept more money too? Is that the type of change that the elections of ’08 meant,......... more spending and higher Congressional salaries?

The amount of money we are talking about in regards to the pending pay raise may be minuscule when compared to a 7 or 8 hundred billion dollar bailout but it is still more money being spent. It is still more money being paid by taxpayers and it is still more money than each member of Congress requires. But more than that , accepting a pay raise during the time we are in is a horrific symbolic gesture that essentially tells the American taxpayer “screw you, were in charge and we are going to do what we want, when we want and how we want”. Never mind the out of work salesman who has no conglomerate that can’t slip congressmen or senators a hefty campaign donation and then request federal assistance for himself. Never mind the additional taxes that Democrats will be requesting taxpayers to pay or the out of work taxpayer who can’t afford to pay their property taxes this year.

By accepting a pay raise, Congress will be making it clear that they have absolutely no concern for the people whose money they spend.

With Democrats in total control of government, if the 2.8% pay raise goes through, than their hold on power will be short lived. If Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi do not put a stop to increasing their salaries than folks, they are not just greedy, they are downright stupid and should not be in office in the first place.

Having control of government makes Democrats responsible for what happens in government. It makes them totally responsible. Accepting a pay raise at a time like this is something that they will have to be held accountable for and they will.

But there is still a chance for them to save face. If they act responsibly and derail any efforts to increase their salaries, they can spare themselves the blame and avoid the certain repercussions of their greed and irresponsibility.

That is one reason why President-Elect Obama should publicly urge the House of Representatives and the Senate to show the American people that they have their priorities in order and that they are aware of the tough times we may be in and demand that they forgo any raise and repeal the 2.8% increase that they will receive.

It is also why POLITICS 24/7 has issued a national petition.

It is a “Declaration of Rejection of a Congressional Pay Raise ”

As a free society, we cannot simply wait for our representatives to act. We must make our desires known before they act.

In the case of irresponsible government action we cannot wait for irresponsibility to be enacted, we must avoid it from happening . So we have initiated a petition to Congress. It is a petition that calls upon them to reject any increases in their “salaries, staffs and office budgets, as well as personal expense limits, and currently allocated per diem expenses. If such a vote or votes are passed at any point during the sessions between January 2009 and January 2011 we demand that a new vote repealing such increases be brought to the floor of both the House of Representatives and the Senate”.

Simply click here for the "DECLARATION of REJECTION of CONGRESSIONAL PAY RAISE" Online petition and make it clear that will tolerate spending more on Congress than they are worth and that you certainly do not intend to tolerate their greed.After signing it you must still do two things. Pass this petition on to others.

Just cut and past the following link into an
email

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/r
ejection-of-congressional-pay-raise.html

Th
en send it to friends, family and business associates and urge them to do the same.

Once you've done that, the second thing you must do is contact the two U.S. Senators representing you in your state and your congressman. Do so either by phone, snail mail or email. No matter how you want to do it, just do it!

If you are really ticked off over this potential pay raise, write your local newspapers too. Send letters to the editors voicing your disapproval of any hint of raising congressional salaries at a time like this.

originally posted 1/4/09
POLITICS 24/7
http://politics247.wordpress.com/
Post Comment:

Comments

“Turning down our automatic pay increase this year is the least Congress could do to demonstrate fiscal responsibility and solidarity with our constituents in these tough economic times,” Paul said. “Much more needs to be done to reduce the size and expense of government, but passing this legislation would be a start.”
His legislation now has 60 co-sponsors, compared to 34 before.
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local
/articles/2009/01/08/20090108Montini0809.html "
My base salary when I came here was $165,000. If you tell most Americans that you need a raise because you're only making $165,000, that's not going to sell."
I'm aware of that, BD. It's impressive.
Ron paul does every year. Last year he gave 75K back to the budget office....
To be honest with you, I'm not quite sure about that. But, your idol, Ron Paul, is a co-sponsor of my Congressman's legislation.
how much of his congressional budget does he return?
My Congressman has introduced a bill in the current Congress to stop the pay raise. Of course, we all know it won't pass. His other one in the 110th Congress was killed in committee. My Congressman then took his raise and donated it to charities, as he promised to do.
With ever expanding deficits and an economy that is headed towards the toilet, you would think they would be willing to cut thier budgets so as to help offset the budget deficits. But alas, only one congressman does that.
The raise is automatic ... but yes, I do agree that they should not accept it.
I'm surprised there aren't more signatures up there.
I know a few years back I was outraged by the yearly pay raises and wrote a letter and got other people to join in on the fuss. A few months later, I heard on the news that the Dems voted to stop receiving the pay raises, but the Reps refused. So it seems strange to hear that what I heard was false. (Not really since we are talking about the media)but how can they say on the news that Congress voted against it and then say they didn't. It's always been outrageous to me. They also raised minimum wage at the same time because that was part of my complaint. And disability has been receiving better yearly increases since then as well. Of course I'm all for pushing as hard as necessary to get them to curb their greed, but we all know old habits die hard. So we do have to push to get them to be more fiscally responsible and stop thinking only about themselves. My whole argument was they can only agree on one thing every year and that's a pay raise for themselves. If they can't accomplish anything for us, they should be fired and replaced by those who can!!!