| From | Comment |
|
|
|
Posted:
2/13/2010 7:08:02 AM
|
|
BD, what is your stance on the federal level ("Defense of Marriage Act")?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
2/13/2010 7:06:28 AM
|
|
Any state that does not recognize marriage between two consenting adults shall be taken on par with any that do not recognize interracial marriage - funny how its the same poeple/states as 40 years ago. I adcocate for all states to reciprocrate - if one state doesnt recognize all, the state where the marriage is legal does not recognize those in the biased state. This is something I am working hard for, and will happen. Welcom to 50 years ago. Thanks dumbass for setting the nation back again, and trying to sever the nation (which is what I think a lot of you people want, but the states will remain united whether you like it or not).
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
2/1/2010 10:23:30 PM
|
|
ty elijah (a much better fake profile) you are right, this violates the states rights.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
2/1/2010 8:07:43 PM
|
|
Funny thing this. If it is an amendment by Congress, it is in violation of the 10th Amendment. If the Supreme Court states this in their judgment, it will become the law of the land. I believe the courts will be the ones to decide this issue once and for all.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
2/1/2010 6:53:34 PM
|
|
whats that i smell, oh, you burning the tenth amendment....
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
1/31/2010 1:58:25 PM
|
|
Really? No.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
1/31/2010 11:58:00 AM
|
|
yes hub because cMock wants to supercede the rights of the states to decide what they want to recognize as a legal marraige and thumb his nose to the tenth amendment.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
1/31/2010 11:02:08 AM
|
|
Hub City Progressive, I actually support THAT instead. However, most of the states do not support that, so I crafted an amendment that makes a compromise and is a sensible replacement to the Defense of Marriage Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
1/31/2010 2:19:41 AM
|
|
I do not support this bill. I support divorcing the government from marriage completely and establishing civil partnerships for tax and legal purposes without respect to race, creed, ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
1/30/2010 10:44:23 PM
|
|
it is written as a bill. and no where is marriage a rite. so while you are superceding the states rite to decide morality in thier own way, it does violate the 10th amendment you liberal pinko,,,
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
1/30/2010 4:13:40 PM
|
|
This is an amendment. It does not violate the Tenth Amendment.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
1/30/2010 2:12:30 PM
|
|
only a liberal would propose a bill that violated the 10th amendment and can't even come close to falling under the commerce clause. fuckin pinko.
|
|